More Articles  Printer Friendly Version

 

Marriage Doesn't Mean Owning All Your Assets Jointly

Marriage is all about togetherness. Yet when it comes to owning assets, too much togetherness may not be financially healthy.

Owning assets jointly is more convenient than individual ownership, and it’s the simplest way to avoid probate after a spouse’s death. But couples often should consider separating their assets. Here’s why:

Estate tax implications. Estate rules let spouses leave unlimited property to each other tax free. That’s okay when the first spouse to die leaves everything to the second, but the second death could result in a whopping tax bill. Couples likely to have estate tax issues could acquire property individually to help maximize the value of each other’s estate tax exclusion. While owning a house jointly is important for giving both spouses equal claim if they divorce, other assets can and should be held separately in roughly equal shares.

Dividing jointly owned property. How you take title also affects who can inherit your property. If you own it individually or jointly as “tenants in common,” each of you may specify in your will that you want a particular asset or share of an asset to go to a designated heir. However, if you take title as “joint tenants” (with rights of survivorship) or “tenants by the entirety”—the most common form of ownership for married couples—you won’t be able to say how assets are split. That may work if you and your spouse share the same beneficiaries. But it could be a problem if, for example, you’re in a second marriage and want to divide assets among children from different marriages.

Consider John and Mary. Because they own their property as tenants in common, each holds 50%, and John can bequeath his share to children from a prior marriage. Mary won’t automatically inherit John’s interest.

But if they hold their assets as joint tenants or tenants by the entirety, the surviving spouse becomes the sole owner of everything the couple owned together. It won’t matter that John’s will names his children as beneficiaries; if he dies first, the title documents will govern, and Mary will decide how assets are divided when she dies.

Other considerations. Owning assets separately is especially important if your combined net worth is at or above the IRS estate tax exemption. The exemption was $3.5 million in 2009 but is set to drop to $1 million in 2011 if Congress doesn't change the law. Once you approach those levels, it pays to consider ways to separate assets. Also, since joint-tenancy assets can be taken by creditors or lost in lawsuits once an individual’s assets are exhausted, doctors or others who can be sued easily will want at least half of their assets in their spouse’s name.

Deciding how to hold title to your assets is not a simple decision, as state laws differ and each situation is unique. We can work with your attorney to help decide what’s best for you and your spouse.


Email this article to a friend

Index
Beware Of Homeowner's Insurance Gaps
Whole Life Or Term? It's A Tough Choice
Tax Is Key To Your Roth IRA Decision
Do You Know Estate Planning Basics?
Do You Know Your Health Care Facts?
Online Calculators Are Often Wildly Wrong About Roth
Businesses Feeling Squeeze Of Higher Health Care Costs
Your 401(k) Choices After A Layoff
Which States Are The Most Friendly To Businesses?
Fighting For Lower Credit Card Rates
Top 1% Paid More Federal Income Tax Than Bottom 95%
Make Use Of Home-Buying Opportunity
Should Retirees Carry A Mortgage?
Despite Concerns, Most Don't Have A Financial Plan
Social Security Benefit Cuts Are Likely

This article was written by a professional financial journalist for Discipline Advisors, Inc. and is not intended as legal or investment advice.

©2010 Advisor Products Inc. All Rights Reserved.